Quantum contextuality — RO2

Run RO2 · L3→L2 attribution/exclusion

23 July 2009

OPEN

1 · Claim tested: Kirchmair et al. (2009): experimental noncontextual-explanation claim, including the disturbance/imperfection qualifier.
2 · Run date / Evidence state: 23 July 2009. The evidence/practice state is frozen to the published experimental record and its contemporaneous disturbance-certification practice.
3 · Verdict: OPEN
4 · Why: One deduplicated A5/bridge scope deficit remains. Coverage is established, but the concrete full-square disturbance-aware realization was not practice-enabled at tR and CertR is not established; Coverage alone therefore does not establish obstruction.
5 · What this does not mean: OPEN does not mean that the experiment failed, that contextuality is false, or that noncontextual models succeed; it records that the full exclusion claim is not closed at the strength of its disturbance qualifier on the 23 July 2009 record.
6 · What would trigger a new run?: Additional, actually available full-scope disturbance-aware certification, a valid analytical transfer meeting the relevant quantitative margin, or a narrower/new C′ creates a new run; none retroactively rewrites RO2.